> Such a shame that such a good article has to have perpetuated the myth that
> boxes are buried!!

Either the reporter didn't do his or her job, or the interviewees didn't.
I'll stay out of the "publicity" debate, but I would suggest that if there
is a substantial inaccurate portrayal of hobby (I didn't read the piece and
declined to be interviewed for it), that the interviewees send a letter to the
editor clarifying the inaccuracies (if whatever medium this is in has some sort
of "letter to the editor" feature to it).

Of course, if someone with a bigger megaphone than you says something that
doesn't seem right, there is generally scant little to be done, but I suppose
if this thing is on-line, then it is not beyond the realm of possibility that
it can be edited.

Cheers

PS - list membership has grown 10% since this thing came out, so I suppose it
was a pretty big megaphone (relative to us, anyway).